Tuesday, 9 February 2016

Russia in "Daily Cluster Bombs in Syria"

Over the past two weeks, Syrian government and Russian military forces have carried out daily air strikes using internationally banned cluster bombs in opposition-held areas across Syria, killing dozens of civilians, according to Human Rights Watch.
In a report released on Monday, the monitoring group said the joint military operations launched at least 14 attacks with the weapons across five governorates since January 26, killing at least 37 civilians, including nine children.
Syrian government forces scale up their assault to recapture Aleppo
Scores of others were also injured, the report said, adding that the total number of cluster attacks during the period was likely to be higher.
"Local activists have reported at least eight additional attacks," it said, but noted they could not be verified.
An international convention banning the use of cluster munitions because of their indiscriminate impact came into force in 2010.
The weapons pose a threat to civilians owing to the widespread destruction they cause. Unexploded bomblets are often left behind following attacks.
The intensified use of the explosives came amid the Syrian government's offensive to seize territory from opposition fighters in the provinces of Aleppo, Idlib, Damascus, Homs and Hama.
Some of the cluster munition attacks reportedly occurred in the northern governorate of Aleppo, where an ongoing offensive has caused  tens of thousands of people  to flee to the Turkish border. 
Life-threatening injuries
Citing examples, HRW said it received reports that in the town of Anadan, cluster munitions and other weapons were used in an air attack that also struck a field hospital on January 27, killing a nurse.
On the same day in the central governorate of Homs, an aircraft dropped cluster munitions on Kafr Laha, a town in opposition-controlled territory under siege by Syrian government forces, killing at least six people and wounding 59 others, including 27 children, the report cited an anonymous local journalist as saying.
Other witnesses confirmed the death toll, HRW said.
"I saw people who had their legs cut off," a journalist with the opposition-affiliated Homs Media Center told HRW.
"One person lost his eye. There were several people who were hanging between life and death. The injured were mostly women and children. All of them were injured from fragments from the submunitions, in the eyes, in the head, in the back. It was very hard to see."
 
 On its Facebook page, Homs Media Center reported that on Sunday, mostly women and children were injured after air strikes using cluster munitions destroyed civilian homes in opposition-controlled areas in the province.
At a December news conference, Igor Konashenkov, a spokesman for the Russian military, denied allegations that the air force had stockpiled cluster munitions in Syria.
He said the "Russian aviation does not use them" and "there are no such weapons at the Russian air base in Syria".
However, the Conflict Intelligence Team (CIT), a Russian activist group that monitors the Russian military's activities abroad, told Al Jazeera it has  substantial evidence that the country uses various types of the munitions in Syria.
"We can confirm Russia indeed uses cluster bombs, specifically RBK-500 Shoab-05, RBK-500 AO-2,5RTM and RBK-500 SPBE," Kirill Mikhailov, a CIT spokesman, said.
"They all have been photographed and filmed both at the Hmeymim airbase in Latakia. The munitions were shown to be either attached to Russian jets, placed on the ground, and in some cases found in residential areas."


Elliot Higgins, a British journalist who has focused on the Syrian conflict, has alsoreported  evidence of Russia's possession of cluster munitions in the country.
"The Russian Defence Ministry has repeatedly denied this, even claiming there's no such munitions at their Syrian airbase," he told Al Jazeera.
"But images from the airbase published by the Russian media outlets [including] Sputnik  and RT, and even the Russian defence ministry, clearly shows them at the base.
"These denials that fly in the face of facts are fairly typical of the Russian Defence Ministry. The big difference now is there's a lot more publicly avaliable information that can be used to fact-check their denials and claims, which, as it turns out, is a very good thing for anyone who actually wants to know what Russia is really doing."
Monitoring groups, including the UK-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights,say Russian air strikes have killed at least  1,000 civilians, including more than 300 children, since they began in September last year.
____________________________________________________________________This article is completely biased against the Russians. The article constantly describes Russia's bombing, and how ineffective it is through the numerous death tolls on the civilian population. As much as I disagree with the bombings, and war in general, i do still see the ridiculous light that the Russians have been put in. Throughout the news, you constantly see what destruction and what bad outcome follows. However, notice on how the author, and the publisher lack the stats on how much the Russians have done to the opposing authority. The author constantly mentions the amount of women and children that have been injured or killed, however how many ISIS Leaders or members have been terminated? Couldn't one make the argument that since these members have been killed, they are saving more lives? In no way am i supporting the bombing, however in America we have a saying, "Live Free or Die." When all of this blows over, these casualties will be remembered as heros.  

23 comments:

  1. I believe that this article is biased to Russia. Because they keep blaming them, but the missiles are banned and they are hurting civilians. Also I think that if they are going to bomb them they should use different types of bombs, and make sure the area is clear.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I don't understand why Russia would have to use cluster bombs. Did they even have a good reason for using this against Syria? That's what I want to know. Overall, this is a really good article that you found.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree that Russia should not use cluster bombs. I think this article is biased against Russia. Who is trying to stop Russia from using cluster bombs? Why does Russia bomb an area where they know civilians live.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I like how you talked about how bias the article was. I was thinking the same thing. There seemed to be no other side to the article at all. I don't support the bombing as well, but I agree with you when you said "Live Free or Die." That was a very interesting thing to say. It is quite true. Over all good article and response!

    ReplyDelete
  5. I agree with you on how this article seems to be biased about Russia but they do make points throughout the article about Russia. I do believe that Russia could have handle this in a much better matter instead of using cluster bombs to try and solve their problems. I'm curious about what was all of the reasons for them to use cluster bombs against Syria.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I think you made a bold statement here in your reflection on the article, but I have to disagree with what you are saying. I think there's really no justification for what Russia is doing to these innocent civilians. I don't really understand your last sentence here, but if I understand what you are trying to say, I can't think these innocent lives being taken would rather die a hero than to just live out the rest of their lives. I can't see any reason for the bombing, and my heart goes out to the civilians who had to be killed due to Russia's ignorance.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I agree with you. Russia should not be using cluster bombs because too many innocent people could get hurt. This is a very informing article that you found.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I believe that they should stop using the cluster bombs because they are hurting innocent people. I agree that this biased against Russia because they keep putting the blame on Russia. Who is trying to stop Russia from using the cluster bombs.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I agree that the article was bias. I think the author could have talked about how many ISIS members were killed, to show that they are not trying to just kill women and children. I don't think what Russia is doing is right and they should not use cluster bombs. We should try to talk to Russia to get them to just use normal bombs, but we need to continue to kill ISIS members to stop the mass murders.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I believe that these women and children are victims. I don't agree with fighting and war it just doesn't make sense why people do it. I understand that people will disagree but I do not think it should cause people to die, I also don't think that people should get stuck in the middle of the fighting when they don't want anything to do with it. I just wish that people could find a way to talk it out and have peace because all people are doing are hurting each other. I don't really agree with the American saying "Live Free or Die" because shouldn't everyone get the chance to just live free and peaceful without having to fight for their freedom. For the last sentence saying "these casualties will be remembered as heroes" what people were you talking about?

    ReplyDelete
  11. I completely disagree with you on your response. I don't think innocent lives were worth losing just to get a few ISIS members. Peoples lives are not worth taking just to take a few bad guys. I completely disagree that these people will be remembered as heroes. Many civilians were killed in WWII and no one was remembered as heroes. I also believe Russia deserves all of the bad light it gets. These cluster bombs are banned for a reason. Russia tried to cover up them having possession of them also. They completely deserve the bias.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I agree, this article is biased towards Russia. But, maybe it should be. They are using illegal bombs, and killing innocent people like it's nothing. Again, ILLEGAL bombs. But then there is the other side of it, when clearly ISIS is doing illegal things, and you fight fire with fire. But, the civilians are doing nothing wrong, wrong place wrong time. Not sure about your last comment, what do you mean the dead will be heroes?

    ReplyDelete
  13. I´m not sure what your last sentence means? I Also don´t think that the author has to provide the information about what the Russians have done to the apposing authority. The author is stating what he thinks. The author is not agreeing with Russia. He is against it, so he is going to wright about his side to support his thought.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Russians involvement has been more detriment than resolving. Bombing has done nothing but punish those not involved.Killing civilians seems unfair just because there governments at war.Then Russia denies using a certain type of weapon when its been proven that they used it. If your trying to stop a war by using bombs at least be open about the weapons that were actually used.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I think that Russia has been doing more damage than resolving things. I also think that Russia did them dirty be denying using a weapon that they did use.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I agree, the article is completely biased against Russians. All it states is the damage that Russia keeps making without showing the outcome the Russians are trying to achieve. I'm sure there were a lot of ISIS members terminated but the article did not say anything about it. I also agree that Russia should not be using cluster bombs as well because of the civilian casualties.

    ReplyDelete
  17. After reading the article and your response to the article, I do agree with you on opposing against war and bombing. The article, from how I viewed it, does state a lot about women and children and casualty but what about the men? The bombings does take out a huge population but will that really solve the problem? The article doesn't sound biased when I read it. What I mean is that I disagree with you when you mentioned about the article being biased.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Yes, I agree that this article is very biased against the Russians. Because of how much bombing and death they have on the civilian population. This bombing cause a massive chaos because it was once a city now it's like a war zone. And definitely yes they'll be remembered as Heroes. It's good that they've killed many ISIS leaders and members.

    ReplyDelete
  19. I obtained a lot of information from this article and that's information I can use to know more about the world. This article is very eye opening even though it's clearly rooting for one side. I enjoyed how the person describes not just the wrong-doings of Russia but how terrible war is and its nature to how some will cross lines to achieve what they desire. I wish to see more articles such as this one because these are the kinds of articles that include more than just one story.

    ReplyDelete
  20. I agree that this article is very one-sided towards Russia and all the bombing going around. I thinks its wrong for all these people to be killed in the area. All the bombing towards Russia is very biased and there really is no view point from the other side. Good response to this article, you really stated a point.

    ReplyDelete
  21. I don't get why Russia has a reason to use cluster bombs. It's so sad to hear about how all these people are getting killed for almost no reason. This was a very informative article though. Great choice!!

    ReplyDelete

  22. This article does seem biased towards Russia, and I also disagree with the bombings. I find that this article is casting a light on Russia and saying "Look these are the bad guys" when in reality they should not be the only ones being sought after. Yes the bombings should be more exact to harmless civilians, but it has been effective in stopping ISIS and it supporters, so in turn I can see what the article is saying, and I may not agree with all of it but I understand it.

    ReplyDelete
  23. In my opinion Russia shouldn't have dropped those cluster bombs on Syria since all it does is cause more chaos and destruction in Syria since it's already lost almost all of Syria due to all the bombing and attacks. I do believe this is a very bias article but then again it has a reason to be after Russia hurt and killed many citizens.

    ReplyDelete