Monday, 25 January 2016

62 People on earth own more than half the world?

The world's richest 62 people now own as much wealth as half of the world's population, according to a report by the charity Oxfam. 
Super-rich individuals saw an increase of 44 percent since 2010, taking their cumulative wealth to $1.76 trillion - equivalent to the total owned by 3.5 billion of the world's poorest people.  
The UK-based charity on Monday also said tax havens were helping corporations and individuals stash away about $7.6 trillion, depriving governments of $190bn in tax revenue every year.
Speaking to Al Jazeera, Oxfam Australia's Chief Executive Helen Szoke said there were no appropriate mechanisms to check if wealth was being shared appropriately.
"We believe there is a need for commitments from global business leaders and political leaders for major tax reform to get rid of the tax havens," Szoke said.
"There's too much leakage of what should be paid in taxation exacerbating this gap [between rich and poor]."
Referring to economic growth in Western countries, such as her native Australia, Szoke said little wealth was reaching the impoverished.
"The startling figure in our domestic context in Australia is that where there has been wealth generation in the last decade, none of that has actually trickled down to some of the Australians who are poor."
Lack of action
Oxfam said wealth is being concentrated in the hands of increasingly fewer people, while the world's poorest continue to get poorer. In 2010, 388 people owned as much as the world's poorest 50 percent. 
Mark Goldring, Oxfam chief executive in the United Kingdom, said the stated concern of world leaders over escalating inequality was not being matched with action.
"It is simply unacceptable that the poorest half of the world population owns no more than a small group of the global super-rich, so few you could fit them all on a single coach. 
"In a world where one-in-nine people go to bed hungry every night, we cannot afford to carry on giving the richest an ever-bigger slice of the cake," Goldring said.
The organisation is calling on world leaders meeting for the World Economic Forum in the Swiss city of Davos later this month to crackdown on tax havens, ensure fair wages, and invest in public services.
___________________________________________________________________
I love this article, because it's such an eye opening piece of news. Through everyday, we are so busy to notice such things, especially for those, like me, in the middle class. But in reality, it has come to a point where three hundred eighty eight people own just as much as the rest of the billions of people living in this Earth. That is insane! The article clearly shows the bias against this "1%" of higher class, especially through it's last paragraph, named "Lack of Action." I agree to an extent through the author's point against them, stating that "It is simple unacceptable that the poorest half of the world owns no more than a small group of people." However, to take to the extreme that the article asks for, is a bit far too much I believe. There is a problem with the rich getting far more richer, and the poorer getting more poor, however the rich have worked hard, and in some ways deserve the rich. However, I think the idea to crackdown on tax havens is a smart, and wise decision. The rich having little to zero taxes is ludicrous. The words of the final sentence ring heavily, when he states "In a world where one in nine people go to bed hungry every night, we cannot afford to carry on giving the richest an ever bigger slice of the cake."

Aljazeera. "62 Mega Rich." Aljazeera News. Aljazeera, 18 Jan. 2016. Web. 25 Jan. 2016. <http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/01/super-rich-62-people-world-160118033855025.html>.

Tuesday, 12 January 2016

What will stop the Oregon Standoff?

Eastern Oregon is a part of the United States that is not often in the news. It is thinly populated, and is mostly vast open space. It is even called the high desert. But all of a sudden, we have been seeing a lot of it.
Armed protesters have been occupying a government-owned wildlife refuge for more than a week now. And they say they do not plan on leaving until their demands are met.
It is happening near the small town of Burns, and the protesters - a mix of farmers, ranchers and survivalists - are angry about what they see as excessive federal control over their lives.
They say the government is applying ever stricter regulations on land they need for cattle grazing. Federal land management policies are - they say - unfair to people struggling to make a living in the area.
So, how will the US federal government fix this issue?
Presenter: Peter Dobbie
Guests:
Pete Santilli, spokesman for the ranchers in the Oregon standoff.
Eric Ethington, communications director at Political Research Associates.
Matt Lee-Ashley, senior fellow and director of public lands at the Center for American Progress.
Source: Al Jazeera
____________________________________________________________________
When reading this article, it was a struggle not to laugh. The article sends off a vibe that makes the reader feel like the United States is full of the stereotypical American ranchers, who only care about their farm and cows. I also love the final sentence the author includes, which is "How will the United State's federal government fix this issue?" At least to me, I felt that the author seems to persecute the United State's government in this short, but insisting question. But back to the article, I love the fact that this is so different from the "normal" news that we see. There isn't any exaggerated death rates, or a non candid picture of a starving child, it is just so out of the blue. A part of me wants to congratulate these men and women for standing up for what they believe in. America was a country where you were allowed to stand up for what you believe, and I applaud the fact that these men and women have gotten National News.

Aljazeera. "What Will Stop the Oregon Standoff?" - Al Jazeera English. Aljazeera, 11 Jan. 2016. Web. 12 Jan. 2016. <http://www.aljazeera.com/programmes/insidestory/2016/01/oregon-standoff-160111172301780.html>.

Monday, 4 January 2016

Denmark and Sweden refuse Refugees?

Denmark has introduced temporary controls along its border with Germany, just hours after Sweden took similar measures to check the flow of refugees.
Sweden began checking documents of travellers from Denmark on Monday for the first time in half a century, causing delays of trains and frustration among travellers.
Those without valid ID documents are denied to board buses, trains and ferries bound for Sweden, but cars are exempt from checks.
Denmark's prime minister said Sweden's move gave his country no option but to impose its own border controls. He appealed to the European Union to take "collective decisions" to better protect its external borders against the tide of migrants and refugees.
"The Swedish ID checks can increase the risk of a large number of illegal immigrants to accumulate in and around Copenhagen," Lars Lokke Rasmussen said in Copenhagen, justifying the new controls on the German border.
Last year about 163,000 refugees sought asylum in Sweden, the largest number for any EU country relative to its population.
But with arrivals running at around 10,000 a week in November, mostly travelling through Denmark, the Swedish government has said it is time to tighten border controls and asylum rules.
Immediate effect
The ID controls appeared to have an immediate effect. Ewa-Gun Westford, Swedish police spokesperson, said that as of midday on Monday only one asylum-seeker had arrived by train across the Oresund bridge.
At the height of the refugee crisis a few months ago, more than 1,000 asylum-seekers crossed the bridge daily.


The border controls follow the reintroduction of border checks in Germany, Austria, France, Belgium and several other European countries.
Rasmussen said the Danish border controls would last for 10 days but could be extended.
Morgan Johansson, Swedish justice and migration minister, welcomed the Danish border checks, but said they came too late.
He told Swedish newspaper Dagens Nyheter that the reason Sweden got overwhelmed last autumn was because Denmark functioned as a "transit country".
He said ID controls could also help authorities to prevent attacks.
"After the attacks in Paris, we're not only faced with the refugee issue but also the issue of terrorism," he said. 
Rights groups have warned that child refugees travelling on their own will be worst-hit by the new checks, as they often travel without documents.
Of those seeking asylum in Sweden in 2015, about 80 percent lacked passports or equivalent IDs at the time of filing their applications, according to the Swedish Migration Agency.
Schengen zone 'in danger'
Reacting to the Scandinavian border checks, Germany warned that the passport-free Schengen zone was "in danger".
Europe faces worsening refugee crisis in 2016
"Freedom of movement is an important principle - one of the biggest achievements [in the EU] in recent years," Martin Schaefer, Germany's foreign ministry spokesperson, said.
"Schengen is very important but it is in danger."
Last week Norway, which is not an EU member but does belong to the Schengen area, said it would start turning back refugees without visas arriving from elsewhere in the Schengen zone, particularly Sweden.
Schaefer said it was "crucial that we in Europe find common solutions" to the refugee crisis, and said the EU must now focus on ensuring the security of its external borders.


The UN refugee agency, UNHCR, has said refugees will face increasingly slim chances of asylum in Europe should more countries impose stricter entry requirements.
Mattias Axelsson, UNHCR spokesperson in northern Europe, said governments must understand that refugees are under tremendous strain and that those fleeing do not always have the possibility to bring ID documents.
"You can't expect that those who have the right to asylum also have the right documents with them from the beginning, that is simply impossible," he told Swedish news agency TT.
"We follow this with growing concern."
Sweden has seen a decrease in the number of people seeking asylum in recent weeks, following news of tighter border checks and stricter rules for residency permits.
The country is facing an acute accommodation shortage for new arrivals, and schools and health services are also under strain.

____________________________________________________________________

The Refugee Crisis of 2015 is one of the largest problems in our generation, and is constantly in the news. However, I feel that the media will always twist the actual information of the burdened EU countries. This isn't the first time the media has falsely accused large scale news, and this is no different. In the article, Denmark and Sweden are presented as heartless, due to the simple fact that they are strengthening their borders. However, one thing they fail to present is that Denmark and Sweden have been overrun with illegal immigrants, and are struggling to keep up with the arriving population. Do you know, what happens to a country when hundreds of thousands of people, who don't speak the local language enter a country? Chaos. And another reason that defending their borders is a good idea, is that since the Paris attacks, many EU countries have been threatened from extremists. So obviously, with that information that this article fails to present, Denmark and Sweden are clearly not in the wrong. 
Aljazeera. "Denmark and Sweden Tighten Border Controls." - Al Jazeera English. Aljazeera, 3 Jan. 2016. Web. 04 Jan. 2016. <http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/01/denmark-sweden-tighten-border-control-160104140849704.html>.